Comprehensive guidelines for peer reviewers to ensure thorough, fair, and constructive evaluation of manuscripts submitted to Excel Journal of Engineering Technology and Management Science.
Peer review is a cornerstone of academic publishing and scholarly communication. We are deeply grateful to our reviewers for their valuable contributions to maintaining the highest quality standards of the Excel Journal of Engineering Technology and Management Science (EJETMS).
These comprehensive guidelines are designed to help you provide thorough, constructive, and professional feedback that enhances the quality of published research and supports authors in their scholarly endeavors.
Essential guidelines for conducting thorough and professional peer reviews
Thank you for agreeing to review manuscripts for Excel Journal of Engineering Technology and Management Science [EJETMS]. Your expertise is invaluable in maintaining the quality and standards of our journal.
As a reviewer, you play a crucial role in the peer-review process, ensuring the validity, clarity, and significance of the research presented.
Step-by-step guide through the peer review process
Receive invitation, evaluate for conflicts of interest, and accept or decline within 48 hours
Conduct comprehensive review assessing originality, methodology, clarity, and significance
Submit detailed review report with clear recommendation and constructive feedback
We are always looking for qualified reviewers in Engineering Technology and Management Science. Join our network of expert reviewers and contribute to advancing scholarly research in your field.
We provide comprehensive support to our reviewers, including training resources, guidelines, and direct editorial assistance when needed.
Join our community of expert reviewers and play a vital role in maintaining the highest standards of academic publishing in Engineering Technology and Management Science.